China Experiments Mixing Covid Vaccine

China Experiments Mixing Covid Vaccine – As we all know that the covid vaccine is useful to be able to strengthen the immune system in fighting the corona virus. But who would have thought that China was experimenting with mixing two vaccines into one?

Earlier this month, the director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention said the country was officially considering developing a COVID-19 vaccine with a different technology as a way to further improve the vaccine’s efficacy.

1. So a frontal attack on the effectiveness of China’s vaccine

The first option is to adjust the dose of the vaccine. Interval between doses or increase the number of doses. Then, is to inject vaccines with different technologies.

In fact, injecting a different type of vaccine is not currently recommended in China. However, a number of local medical experts, agree the method is applied.

This option is thrown by Gao as a frontal attack on the effectiveness of China’s vaccines, which are relatively low.

2. China declares safe, other countries are still undecided

From clinical trials and research conducted in China, mixing different types of COVID-19 vaccines can be ascertained to be safe.

However, a number of countries, such as the UK and others, are still researching whether it is true that combining vaccine types in the injection process can provide safer protection.

Also Read :Facts About the Biosphere Experiment

3. Those who have received the second dose, can be injected for the third time

On the other hand, Gao’s opinion is also shared by Tao Lina, a vaccine expert from China. According to him, what Gao said is quite reasonable because the level of antibodies formed from vaccines made in China is still much lower.

Therefore, Tao suggested that there be a third dose of injection using a different type of vaccine.

“However, vaccination must be carried out at full speed. Don’t wait until there is a perfect vaccine,” explained Tao.…

Facts About the Biosphere Experiment

Facts About the Biosphere Experiment – Some scientists conduct a study to find out whether humans can live in an artificial world or not. At first glance, it sounds pretty cool. History says it is billed as an “ecological laboratory and prototype planetary commune”. Was the test working properly, and for what purpose? Come on, take a closer look!

1. There are several different goals that Biosphere 2 has to achieve
Biosphere 2 is a very bold project. It is considered the second Earth, and the company behind this grand design built a completely independent complex based on the natural systems of the world. Biosphere 2 is a scientific experiment intended to determine how capable humans are of setting up bases on the moon, or on other planets.

There are more ideas from these Space Biospheres Ventures. It was designed by a private company, which The Washington Post describes as an “ecopreneurial project”. It is also meant for business, where there is a tourism factor behind it. Biosphere 2 is open to visitors, they can take a 2 hour tour of the place (from outside, of course). Space Biospheres Ventures is a testing ground for patented technologies for profit.

Facts About the Biosphere Experiment

2. The group behind Biosphere 2 isn’t quite ‘Scientific’
According to The Washington Post, from the start, the scientific community was less than impressed with the experiment. This corresponds to the group living in Biosphere 2. The Biosphere 2 program is a follower of a 70s-era community called the “Synergetic Civilization.”

The group is led by John Allen. He was a man who believed that Western civilization would collapse. He encouraged his followers to stage demonstrations and promote their vision and mission, while performing rituals.

In the 90s, Allen became the head of development for Biosphere 2. And it was Allen himself who chose the members of the commune to live in Biosphere 2. This created a big problem for the credibility of the project. As early as 1985, the news reported that the group resembled a kind of “cult”. Related to bullying, isolation, indoctrination into group beliefs, and child abuse and neglect. By the time Biosphere 2 opened, it was still debatable.

Also Read ;Worst Animal Experiment Ever

3. What’s really inside Biosphere 2?
In 1985, The Washington Post reported that a multimillionaire named Edward Bass, donated approximately US$30 million towards the construction of Biosphere 2. The University of Arizona said that construction began in 1986. Biosphere 2 was impressively constructed, covering more than three hectares, which contains tropical rainforests, wetlands, savanna grasslands, deserts, and even has an ocean with its own coral reefs.

In the basement – which spans nearly three full hectares – is the “Technosphere”, where all equipment such as generators, “Energy Centers” and units that will help control the air temperature and humidity within the structure are stored. They also use electricity – in theory – but they have to generate their own electricity, whether that be by solar, wind, or other methods.…

The Cruelest Psychological Experiment

The Cruelest Psychological Experiment –  Psychological Experiments are experiments that are quite rarely carried out by scientists compared to other experiments, but this psychological experiment is no less sadistic than other experiments.

Psychology is always interesting to discuss and study. Knowing human nature and how it is formed helps us understand ourselves and how the world and society work.

But did you know that in the process of acquiring these knowledge, there are often terrible experiments being carried out? Whether it’s the experiment on animals or humans themselves. The following is an inhuman psychological experiment that ever happened.

1. Electric shock therapy to children

This practice was common in the 1960s. One of them is by Dr. Lauretta Bender who works at Creedmore Hospital in New York. He selected the children who would be the subject of the experiment through interviews using the method of applying a small pressure to the heads of the children who were collected in a group.

Those who respond to that pressure are considered by Bender to be an early symptom of schizophrenia. By providing the electrocution method, Bender believed it was able to cure the children. There are at least 100 children who follow this therapy with the youngest children aged three years.

2. The Aversion Project

In the apartheid era of South Africa, Dr. Aubrey Levin was assigned the task of healing homosexuals. Thousands of homosexuals were imprisoned in the Voortrekkerhoogte military hospital.

There they found an electroconpulsive method to “cure” the homosexual condition. The practice was that these homosexual men were shown pictures of naked men and told to fantasize about it before finally getting electric shocks.

3. Experiment with facial expressions

University of Minnesota psychologist Carney Landis conducted a study in 1924 to determine facial expressions. Specifically, Landis wants to know the expression of someone who is happy, happy, afraid, sad, disgusted and others. He also recruited several students and gave them stimulants which would later photograph their faces.

The facial expression stimulants include pornography, ammonia, touching reptiles and beheading rats. One third of the participants were willing to behead the mice even though they did not know how to behead the right way. The rest refused, Landis himself beheaded the mice.

Also Read:Craziest Animal Experiments in History

4. Bobo Doll Experiment

Still the same in the 1960s, there was an experiment that aimed to demonstrate how children learn about a habit. The Albert Bandura experiment collected 72 children of school age with a large doll named Bobo.

Bandura shows adults who act cruelly to Bobo to the children and leave the children one by one alone with the doll. From there, the children began to torture Bobo, even in harsh conditions. Bandura did this research twice and got the same results.

5. Study of monsters

In 1939, 22 orphans living in Davenport, Iowa were subjected to psychological tests. To study the problem of stuttering, the 22 children were divided into two groups. The first group received positive speech therapy and was consistently praised for her speech skills.

The other group received negative speech therapy in which they received exclusion for any imperfect speech. The result was that those in the second group who at that time were still able to speak normally ended up having speech problems for the rest of their lives.…